Did our species EVOLVE to sit on concrete and beg for nickels, dimes, and quarters, or did our species EVOLVE to hunt animals and gather fruit and vegetables? Which is easier and more convenient for a member of our species to do : (1) exactly what our species EVOLVED to, or (2) an activity that does NOT, in any way, shape, or form even remotely resemble what our species EVOLVED to do?
Just how “lazy” and “pathetic” is a member of our species who campaigns for peoples’ nickels, dimes, and quarters as relentlessly as a Machiavellian politician campaigns for votes? Can such a relentless campaign for peoples’ nickels, dimes, and quarters REALLY be an “easy” and “convenient” “path of least resistance”? How can it be such a ” “path of least resistance” when it is so UNnatural and perverse relative to the hunting and gathering our species EVOLVED to invest time and energy in?
Given the above, how constructive is it to assume that street-beggars are “lazy” “bums” with “no work-ethic”? How constructive is it to assume that the Get-A-Job Theory of Ending Poverty is THE Nobel-Prize-winning solution that street-beggars themselves are simply refusing to implement?